BTC Multiplier 389C

Identification

“BTC Multiplier 389C” does not correspond to a known, verifiable individual or organization name in public records. In practice, it appears to be a label or identifier (e.g., a page/session/build variant code) associated with the site btcmultiplier.com, rather than a “person.”
The referenced page was:

text http://btcmultiplier.com/games.php

I was not able to safely open and inspect that page directly in this environment, so any attribution to a specific operator (real person/company) cannot be confirmed from the page itself.

What “BTC Multiplier” sites typically are

Independent reporting and scam-analysis coverage describes “BTC Multiplier / BTC-Multiplier” branded sites as fitting a common pattern of “bitcoin multiplier / bitcoin doubler” schemes—sites that advertise implausible, guaranteed, or unusually high returns and provide little-to-no verifiable ownership, licensing, or operational transparency. (ccn.com)

In particular, reporting about BTC-Multiplier.com (note the hyphenated domain) characterizes it as a scam and notes that such sites often mimic or reuse naming associated with earlier bitcoin gambling brands, while remaining operated by unknown parties. (ccn.com)

“389C”: what it most likely indicates (and what it does not)

Because there are no credible public sources tying “389C” to a specific person, the most plausible explanation is that “389C” is an internal identifier used by the website or by an associated scam campaign (for example, a template build, landing-page variant, or tracking code). There is not enough reliable public evidence to state more than that.

Practical conclusion

• Who is it? Not a clearly identified “who” (person/company) in public data; the operator identity is effectively anonymous based on available sources. (ccn.com)
• What is it? Most consistent with a bitcoin “multiplier/doubler” style site, a category widely associated with fraud risk. (hacker9.com)

If you can paste any text from that page (or share a screenshot), I can give a more specific, page-based identification (e.g., what product it claims to be, what wallets/contacts it lists, and what indicators it matches).